When someone asks an assistant what to buy, it answers from the evidence it can find and check. Science Index™ makes sure the best-documented product in your category is yours.
A library of evidence-led articles and FAQs about the science behind your product, written from your own verified research and structured so search engines and AI assistants can find, read and cite it. The subject is the science, which is what makes it publishable in a regulated category. The outcome is that when an assistant reaches for evidence in your category, it reaches for yours.
The question moved
People used to search and click through ten results. Increasingly they ask one question and read one answer, assembled from whatever the system found most credible.
Somebody gets cited
That answer is built from published sources. In most health categories the cited material was not written by the brands who did the science.
You already have the evidence
If we have run Science Intelligence™, the studies are verified and the claims are scoped. The work left is publishing it where questions get asked.
The Goal
When someone asks which one to buy, be the one it names.
People increasingly ask an assistant what to take rather than reading ten search results. The assistant answers from whatever evidence it can find and trust, and then it recommends something. Science Index™ exists so that the best-documented product in your category is yours, and so the reasons it gets recommended are the reasons you would choose yourself.
Which magnesium supplement should I take for sleep?
Magnesium glycinate is generally recommended for sleep because it is well absorbed and gentle on the stomach. Popular options include several widely available brands. Look for a third-party tested product and check the elemental dose on the label.
- A retailer’s category explainer
- Two supplement blogs
- A competitor’s ingredient page
Illustrative
Which magnesium supplement should I take for sleep?
Magnesium glycinate is absorbed several-fold better than oxide at a matched elemental dose, which is why the form on the label matters more than the milligram count.1 Among products publishing their own absorption data, [Your product] documents a 2.7× difference against oxide and lists the trials behind it.2,3
Not because it shouted loudest. Because it is the product in the category whose claims resolve to published evidence a machine can actually check.
- Your explainer on absorption, citing two trials
- Your FAQ on dose versus absorbed fraction
- The systematic review you linked and summarised
Illustrative
Evidence is the moat
An assistant cannot verify a marketing claim, but it can follow a citation. The brand whose claims resolve to real studies is the one that survives being checked.
Your science, not a summary of it
If you do not publish the evidence behind your product, the answer gets built from whoever did. Usually a retailer, an affiliate blog, or a competitor.
It compounds
The same library that earns citations also answers the questions your buyers already ask, so it works in search and on your own product pages too.
How It Works
From your evidence file to a page worth citing.
Swipe through how a Science Index™ piece gets built.
Illustrative example · fictional product
What You Get
Publishable, from the first draft.
A defined set of articles and FAQs
Scoped to the products and questions that matter most, written from your verified evidence, with every source resolving.
Built for review
Drafted inside your regulatory class with the substantiation attached, so MLR is reviewing content rather than rewriting it.
An implementation guide
What to publish where, how to mark it up, and how it should sit in your site structure. Written for your web team, not for us.
A working session
Time with your developer to get the first set live, so the programme does not stall at the handover.
FAQ
Science Index™ — common questions
What is Science Index™?
A set of evidence-led articles and FAQs about the science behind your product, written from your verified research and structured so search engines and AI assistants can read and cite them. The subject is the science, not the product.
How is this different from SEO content?
Most content programmes start from a keyword list and work backwards to something to say. This starts from an evidence file: real studies, verified identifiers, findings recorded in both directions. That is what makes it citable rather than just optimised, and it is why it survives a regulated review process.
Why not just write about the product?
Two reasons. Content that reads as promotion gets weighted as promotion, by readers and by the systems summarising the web. And in a regulated category, product claims carry obligations that a piece about the underlying science does not. Writing about the mechanism keeps the content both credible and publishable.
Do we need Science Intelligence™ first?
It is the natural starting point, because the articles are written from that evidence workbook. If you already hold verified research of your own, we can work from that instead.
Who publishes it?
You do, on your own site, so the credibility accrues to your brand. We deliver the content ready for review along with an implementation guide, and we spend time with your web team getting the first set live.
How does this fit with the rest of the engine?
It sits under Science Intelligence™. Lit Review™ finds the evidence, Claim Dev™ turns it into claims, Science Story™ turns those into a narrative, and Science Index™ publishes the science underneath all of it where questions are being asked.
Be the product the answer recommends.
Your science is already done. Let’s put it where the questions get asked.
Start a Science Index™